Comment on you might be what i want, but you’re not what i need

  1. here, hold on, i need to break out my GCSE writing scheme, okay:

    throughout their entire transparent argument, the writer has shown deep idiocy for all social courtesy in the writing community. Their use of the phrase "stop commenting back to me" implies that the defendant had replied more than once, which is clearly stupid and makes one question whether they should go back to set eight maths. This idea is supported by they use of a question in the rhetoric variety; "who said the story wasn't good storytelling?" when they were the one who literally called the ending "stupid".
    As a queer person, the defendant kindly asks for the accusor to not bring up their lesbian moms who no one gives two flying fucks about (seriously, any askers?) as it has no relevance to the argument, and further enunciates that the point im trying to make is that you should fuck off, wanker.

    Comment Actions
    1. As you once again bring me back into the thread after the writer asked not to lol. But bravo on the dedication that took 😂😂. Also you’re the one who brought up my moms not me. Maybe don’t assume someone’s family relationship that was a mistake on your part. And really a funny one considering what the actual story is about. You being queer brings no relevance to this in the same way my lesbian moms don’t so maybe take your own advice on that? Also as long as someone comments to me I’m going to comment back keep them coming 🤷♀️😂😂

      Comment Actions