I am going to have to say that I respectfully disagree. One, it's not just Tony negotiating the Accords. Yes, he is a big part of that in my fic, but I did make a point to name several other people (real world politicians and diplomats) that worked on the Accords. And two, amendments happen all the time. New laws are introduced all the time. Look to the US government if you want an example. If you want examples from the UN: on July 3 the UN removed countries from one of its resolutions (sanctions list), the UN Charter has been amended four times, and there are several cases of the UN pushing countries to make amendments to their own legislations. I'm sure there's more out there if you search hard enough but I'm tired and it's midnight currently.
I do understand why some disagree with the Accords (and keep in mind I never actually gave my opinion on the Accords), but once again I'd like to state that there is a big difference between agreeing on the Accords and signing them. People sign documents they don't agree with all of the time so they can change them later down the road. It's called compromise. I would love to discuss why even those who disagreed with everything the Accords said should have signed (literally this is what half of my conversations are with my best friend, he's a die hard Team Cap member).
With all that said I do see where you're coming from and completely respect what you said. (Although if we're gonna talk about unrealistic political occurrences in the MCU can someone explain how the Accords were drafted, written, originally negotiated, and signed and ratified by 117 in the span of one year???)
Comment on Protocol SOTERIA
Platos_Ghost Fri 07 Jul 2017 04:11AM UTC
Comment Actions